Showing posts with label fan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fan. Show all posts
Saturday, 23 September 2017
Hellraiser Fan Films Part 1
Hellraiser Fan Films Part 1
All three of the fan films Im reviewing this week are view-able online. Links are included at the beginning of each review. The actual video quality on all three are lacking, having been posted on Youtube before higher fidelity was available, or having been made before higher fidelity was available, on equipment that is old or outdated by todays standards.
Hellbent: A Hellraiser Chronicle (Fraught Productions, Dir. by Geoff Harner, 1993)
Hellbent is the first film I watched for these reviews, which is fitting because it was the first fan-film made based off the Hellraiser IP. It tells the story of Whitfield a drug addict looking for a fix in his small British town. Trying several friends and potential hook-ups he finally finds himself wandering the streets empty handed when a transient offers to to sell him a box that will give him the pleasure that he seeks. He buys the box and, locked in his garage, he solves it. Instead of summoning the cenobites however the box begins to bleed. Unfathomably, Whitfield decides to taste the blood which seems to cause him agony, making his eyes bleed and him writhe in pain. His friend Owen arrives moments later to discover Whitfield in the garage surrounded by hanging hooks with his eyes bleeding. Whitfield tells Owen that he�s crossed over into �heaven� and tries to get Owen to try the blood from the box. Owen refuses and Whitfield summons the chains to hook Owens flesh then proceeds to cut him down with a sword. We see Whitfield one last time, his eyes blacked out and menacing.
The movie is rough, but considering it was filmed in 1993 for what was obviously a shoestring budget and on what appears to be a camcorder, this is no surprise. The effects are cheap but there are a couple of nice moments, a stop-motion cut of nails going in around somebodys eye, for instance. The acting is unconvincing and the actual framing of each scene is also somewhat poor overall with the camera shaking, and framing the action at odd angles.
It�s not a good movie, but given the nature of the film this is forgivable. These are obviously a group of friends who enjoy making film and have built up a large backlog of independent movies over the last 20 years, and still appear to be making films. Is it worth watching? Yes, but only if you like the Hellraiser franchise and want to see some love given to the IP by a group of enthusiastic individuals. It�s only 10 minutes, so it�s easy to watch and appreciate. Otherwise, give it a skip.
Hellraiser: Prophecy (Dir. Jonathan Kui, 2006)
(part 2 here).
The second film is Hellraiser: Prophecy. This tells the tale of the beginning of the second Angelic war that has begun between Michael and Gabriel. Interested in seeing Michael win in order to keep the status quo in Hell, Lucifer (Jeremy Yost) has come to earth in human form to find somebody to solve the Lamentation Configuration for him so he can access the Labyrinth and recruit the cenobites to fight on the side of Michael. He does so by tricking Natasha (Lori Pyzocha) a graduate student in theology who�s currently trying to translate a Grimoire of the Gash into solving the puzzle box. She does so and summons four cenobites who take her back to the Labyrinth. The lead Cenobite, Angelique (Monica Dus) listens to Lucifer�s proposal and agrees to help, but only if he comes back to the Labyrinth and speaks to Leviathan himself. He does so, but realizes at last minute that it�s a trick when the hooks appear and begin to tear his flesh. Angelique tells him that it this was the Cenobites plan all along. At that moment he appears to unleash his own power and the film ends.
It�s a rough film. There are some genuinely fun moments, and the plot is amazingly thought provoking and cool. Sadly the execution isn�t there. It�s a bad film, but only when compared to films that have a greater budget. Some of the special effects are clever and well done, like the hooks going into Natasha and Lucifer�s flesh, and the solution of the puzzle box (though that might be a borrowed asset honestly). The acting is poor. There are some performances better than others, Jeremy Yost as Lucifer has a few good moments, as does Monica Dus as Angelique. But none of the performances are great, though there are some passable moments. The makeup has the potential to be good but, it fails. Angelique�s makeup is almost awesome, except you can see parts of her hairline from under the skullcap. The other Cenobites appear to have masks on. Butterball�s mask is nearly convincing, but the �Spike� cenobite.... oh, what a terrible mask.
The filmmakers have made two Hellraiser films, as well as making of documentaries for the this film. I will look at the other film that they have produced next week (Hellraiser: Deader-Winter�s Lament). This film is short, about 20 minutes divided up into two parts on Youtube. It is worth watching, once again, if you�re a fan of the Hellraiser franchise, otherwise skip it.
The Tontine (Dir. Scott Hampton, 2006)
Part 2.
Part 3.
This film is only tangentially a Hellraiser film as it�s adapted from a story from the Hellraiser comics from the early 1990�s. The film is about a group of 6 individuals who enter into a tontine* with each other. They have each put in a small amount of money but who are really benefitting from increased luck that occurs after each individual dies. After the agreement is reached they play a game of Russian roulette until one of their numbers dies, increasing the luck of the remaining members. They agree to meet once every three years and play russian roulette, randomly killing off one of their members until only one remains, gaining the pool of money they each invested as well as the luck and fortune of each of the previous members. The tontine works. Their luck increases with each death, all of them becoming wealthy and successful in their various lives. The narrator of the film recalls how he met Eric, the first victim of the tontine and the one who proposed it. Noting how Eric arrived knowing his darkest secrets and seemed to arrive with this information from a mysterious book called the Drawn Veil. The other members note similar meetings with Eric. Each meeting goes similarly with only one hiccup through the course of the film.
This movie is well done. Very well done for what is a fan film. It�s not directly a Hellraiser film, it has no cenobites, puzzle box, or the Lamentation Configuration, but it was adapted from a story in the first run of Hellraiser Comics from the early 1990�s**. The plot is solid, the cinematography is fantastic as well. The acting, for the most part is good. In fact there are instances where the acting is very good. Unfortunately I am unable to find a proper cast list for this movie so am unable to give proper credit for the stand out performances. The actor who plays Eric does a great job, as well as the actor who plays Lloyd. The Narrator (Ryan) does ok. Well enough to carry the film though his narration is much better than his on screen time. The whole film could be expanded into a feature length, at thirty minutes though it�s doesn�t waste any of the viewer�s. time.
Sadly, it appears that Break of Dawn of Productions isn�t active any more. They have several more films on their Youtube channel, but the last update was four years ago. They are a talented group of filmmakers and know how to play to their strengths in order maximize the quality of their production. Should you watch this? Absolutely! Even if you�re not a Hellraiser fan, if you have 30 minutes check this movie out. It�s divided into three parts, having been put on Youtube back when only 10 minute intervals were viable. The quality of the acting, directing and cinematography makes this movie well worth checking out.
*A Tontine is an agreement between investors where the payout is increased by the other investor�s shares once that investor dies. They are not legal here in the US, but here is an article by the Washington Post that goes into what a tontine is historically and the potential for modern tontines.
**I have searched for which issue this particular story comes from and who the other is, but have thus far come up short on information. If any readers happen to know, please comment or email us so we can update this review.
download file now
Sunday, 10 September 2017
Hellraiser Fan Films Part 2
Hellraiser Fan Films Part 2
[Unfortunately I was unable to find a version Hellraiser: Deader-Winter�s Lament on youtube to view.The film maker does offer it on DVD and I may try and track it down before Halloween to review it. Meanwhile here are three more Hellraiser fan films, continuing the reviews from last week. Links to each film are provided.]
Wordsworth (dir. Phil Robinson, 2007, story by Neil Gaiman)
Wordsworth is the story of Wordsworth (Aaron Darragh), appropriately enough, who is obsessed with words: books, word puzzles and script in general. While at a bus station he finishes a crossword puzzle that he�s working on to pass the time. The man sitting next to him notices and offers him a crude crossword to work on. He then stands and leaves, revealing that hes blind. Wordsworth quickly dives in, the first question asks �What you did to the rabbit?� He ponders the question a moment, then jots down �drowned.� This continues for what appears to be weeks or even months. Each question either refers to a dark moment in his past, or requires him to commit some heinous deed to reveal the answer. He moves forward, committing even more grotesque actions as he goes until he reaches the last question: �The Gateway� which the answer is �Hell.� He fills in the blank and opens up the gateway. Chains rip his flesh and the words �Love Me� appear across his chest. Here the film ends.
The story is fantastic! But credit doesn�t go to the filmmakers, they�ve adapted a short story by Neil Gaiman that he wrote for the Hellraiser comics (issue #20, 1993). While the story is interesting and engaging, the treatment is not. There is constant narration (by Phil Robinson) accompanied by constant, stylized text across the screen. This would be fine if the script wasn�t constant, but it quickly becomes a distraction. The narration itself is done with a distorted voice, which also wears thin very quickly. We see the actors act out the narration behind the blocks of text or between cuts to black screens where the narration appears, and it quickly becomes tedious. The effects are nearly non-existence, which is understandable given the limited budget the filmmakers likely had. What effects are there are ok, but fall flat and really only occur at the end.
Neil Gaiman�s short stories are typically very good, and this is no exception. Ultimately I don�t feel like the filmmakers truly made the story their own. I�d skip the movie and see if you can track down the original comic or a short story presentation of the story.
Skankobite (dir. David Lindabury, 2005)
A redneck Daddy (Ben Armstrong) watches tv, and continuously yells for his �skanky� daughter Krystal (Madeleine Corrie). She finally walks through the front door and proceeds to sit on the floor and paint her nails. He yells for her to get him a beer, then demands his �Skull� chew. It�s a puzzle box in the shape of a chew can, and when she gives it to him he is unable to open it. He throws it back to her and she solves it, much like the puzzle boxes of the Hellraiser films. She gives him the now open chew can and he stuffs a mouthful of it in his mouth. This summons cenobite like creatures: a waitress, a hunter and a �nasTcar� fan, who hook him with the chains and hooks of their feature film counterparts. The hunter tells Krystal to leave, but she refuses, so the �cenobites� change her into one of them by tearing her flesh from her belly, changing her hairdo, and makeup as well as clothing. This makes her the eponymous Skankobite. The film ends with the four of them moving forward to finish torturing Daddy.
This film is awful. There�s some moments in it that would work in any other film, but are completely wasted here. The �Skull� can is actually pretty cool, and has some of the same features as the puzzle box from the feature films. Some of the make-up effects on Krystal�s transformation into the �Skankobite� is done fairly well, at least where the flayed flesh appears. But that�s about it. The movie tries really hard to be funny. It�s not: The writing is terrible, the acting is terrible and the camera zooms in for the gross out factor: spittle and chew, drool, slime. It�s not simply blood and guts, which would be expected in a Hellraiser film. It�s almost focusing on the bodily functions. On top of that, there�s moments of dubbing that do not match anything on screen and sounds very out of place. The film wants to be a parody, and technically it is, but it�s not a good one.
I couldn�t recommend this film to fans of even terrible parodies. I can�t reiterate how bad it is. I suppose if, despite my warnings, you�re still curious check it out. But seriously, don�t waste your time.
No More Souls (dir. Gary J. Tunnicliffe, 2004)
The earth has been wiped of all human life. Pinhead (Gary J. Tunnicliffe) sits in a throne room in the halls of the Labyrinth and comments on his state of being, lamenting that it has been ages since he has experienced the flesh of someone. His existence is empty and finally, in desperation, he solves Lemarchand�s box and summons fellow cenobites who tear him apart. The film ends with the other cenobites placing Pinhead�s face on a pillar.
The film is short. The film is simple. There�s really only one character, Pinhead, and he gives you the exposition in relatively short time. The rest of the soliloquy is short, but poignant. Gary J. Tunnicliffe does a great job as old Pinhead, and while he is no Doug Bradley, he�s very convincing and satisfying in the part. The makeup is outstanding! This makes sense when you learn this production was created by an effects house. Mr. Tunnicliffe has a long history in the makeup and special effects field. As does the rest of the cast and crew. It�s actually unfair to call this a fan film, as most of the individuals involved are working professionals. However, it appears that the movie was made because those involved enjoy the Hellraiser franchise. Which, still qualifies it in my book.
The movie is short, only about seven minutes, so go watch it now.
[There are more fan films out there. Some require a bit of digging to find. Theres some you may even come across some by accident with some careful google-fu and a bit of luck. I may come back to this in the near future, perhaps as a bonus review in the lead up to Halloween, but next week Im going to switch things up and look at some zombie films.]
download file now
Saturday, 9 September 2017
Xperia Z5 smartphone worth buying only if you are a Sony fan
Xperia Z5 smartphone worth buying only if you are a Sony fan
The Xperia Z5 Dual is Sony�s attempt to make a premium smartphone on the cheap. To that end, it falls flat. Upgrades like a beefed-up camera and a fingerprint scanner can�t disguise the limitations of what�s supposed to be a flagship device.
And when that device comes with a Dh2,699 price tag, that�s a real problem.
The Z5�s design is virtually identical to that of its predecessor (in the Middle East at least) the Z3+. That�s a problem, given that the Z3+�s design was virtually identical to the Z3, which in turn offered only minor updates to the now 18-month-old Z2.
Even worse, the Z5 retains the uneven joins of the Z3+, its sharp edges giving its design a distinctly mid-range feel.
Also unchanged is the 5.2- inch full HD display, which is also starting to show its age in comparison with the likes of the iPhone 6S and Galaxy S6 range, but also with far cheaper competitors like the Huawei P8.
Those looking for a better viewing experience are advised to turn their attention to the 4K display of the Z5 Premium, retailing for Dh300 more.
One welcome innovation over the Z3+ is that the power button on the right-hand side of the phone now doubles as a fingerprint reader, allowing for easy unlocking of the handset without entering a PIN or swipe code.
The other major upgrade is the camera, with the Z5 offering a 23 MP rear camera, while retaining the 5.1 MP selfie snapper.
While the Z5 captures images with plenty of detail and nice bright colours, they aren�t significantly different to those taken with other devices to make the camera a key selling feature.
At the end of the day, the Z5 is only worth buying if, for some reason, Sony�s handset designs still appeal to you. Despite the camera upgrade, it doesn�t have the design or specifications to compete with the likes of Samsung and Apple, and at Dh2,699 it�s a far more expensive offering than excellent alternatives from Huawei and LG. For fans only.
q&a no more underwater selfies
John Everington expands on Sony�s new Xperia Z5 Dual:
I was just getting used to the Z3+. What about the Z4? I�m confused.
It is a bit complicated. The Z3+ was indeed the last handset launched here in the UAE, but the same device was branded as the Z4 in Japan. Perhaps the Z5 will bring things back together again, or perhaps Sony�s next flagship will take a leaf out of Microsoft�s book and be called the Z8. We�ll keep you posted.
Back to the Z5. What happens if I want a smaller phone or a sharper display?
Well, you�re in luck. In addition to the Z5 Dual, there�s also the Z5 Compact, which sports a 4.6-inch display and is available now for Dh2,299. More intriguing perhaps is the Z5 Premium, the first smartphone in the world with a 4K display, which will go on sale this month for Dh2,899.
Can I still use the Z5 to take underwater selfies?
Unfortunately not. After touting the Xperia�s underwater capabilities for ages, Sony has performed a volte face, and now recommends not using the camera in the pool. It�s apparently still waterproof enough to survive having a cup of coffee spilt on it, though I thought it best not to test this.
And how about battery life?
Sony reckons you can get two days of use off a single charge. While this is a tad optimistic, it gets through an entire day of standard usage comfortably enough.
download file now
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)